<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LCD, meet LED</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pallock.net/peter/blog/archives/10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pallock.net/peter/blog/archives/10/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 03:09:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon Moeller</title>
		<link>http://www.pallock.net/peter/blog/archives/10/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Moeller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 03:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallock.net/peter/blog/archives/10/#comment-214</guid>
		<description>Halogen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Halogen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Pallock</title>
		<link>http://www.pallock.net/peter/blog/archives/10/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Pallock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 14:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallock.net/peter/blog/archives/10/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>I too wish we could continue to bask in the gentle orange glow of the incandescent bulb. However, last December Congress passed an energy bill which, among other things, bans Edison&#039;s invention by 2014, starting with the 100 watt bulb in 2012. 

Since fluorescent bulbs are currently the only cost effective alternative, and since unfiltered fluorescent bulbs give me a headache after a few hours, most any other option would be welcome, including LEDs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too wish we could continue to bask in the gentle orange glow of the incandescent bulb. However, last December Congress passed an energy bill which, among other things, bans Edison&#8217;s invention by 2014, starting with the 100 watt bulb in 2012. </p>
<p>Since fluorescent bulbs are currently the only cost effective alternative, and since unfiltered fluorescent bulbs give me a headache after a few hours, most any other option would be welcome, including LEDs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon Moeller</title>
		<link>http://www.pallock.net/peter/blog/archives/10/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Moeller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 20:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallock.net/peter/blog/archives/10/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>While these new LED screens are surpassing the fluorescent bulbs (that I long to call &quot;of yore&quot;), I still think my &quot;one-LED per-pixel plus an amorphous prism to refract the correct color&quot; idea is the way to go. Oh, to be an engineer.

&lt;blockquote&gt;LED bulbs for your living room lamp?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Perish the thought. Give me filament and flame!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While these new LED screens are surpassing the fluorescent bulbs (that I long to call &#8220;of yore&#8221;), I still think my &#8220;one-LED per-pixel plus an amorphous prism to refract the correct color&#8221; idea is the way to go. Oh, to be an engineer.</p>
<blockquote><p>LED bulbs for your living room lamp?</p></blockquote>
<p>Perish the thought. Give me filament and flame!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

