<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Concede the Premise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pallock.net/peter/blog/archives/12/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pallock.net/peter/blog/archives/12/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:24:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dad</title>
		<link>http://www.pallock.net/peter/blog/archives/12/comment-page-1/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallock.net/peter/blog/archives/12/#comment-390</guid>
		<description>An atheist tried to argue with me recently that immorality had no consequences for those who are single and yet he was firm in the need to maintain fidelity in marriage. We had no time to debate but as I thought about it I should not argue the consequences or lack of consequences. The discussion needed to move to a higher level: God, the Creator, has commanded us not to sin morally. That is the discussion, whether a man should obey his creator or not rather than whether immorality had or did not have immediate or long term consequences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An atheist tried to argue with me recently that immorality had no consequences for those who are single and yet he was firm in the need to maintain fidelity in marriage. We had no time to debate but as I thought about it I should not argue the consequences or lack of consequences. The discussion needed to move to a higher level: God, the Creator, has commanded us not to sin morally. That is the discussion, whether a man should obey his creator or not rather than whether immorality had or did not have immediate or long term consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathaniel Darnell</title>
		<link>http://www.pallock.net/peter/blog/archives/12/comment-page-1/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Darnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 04:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallock.net/peter/blog/archives/12/#comment-389</guid>
		<description>Great post, Peter, and well stated it &#039;twas!

ND</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Peter, and well stated it &#8217;twas!</p>
<p>ND</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mandy Novotny</title>
		<link>http://www.pallock.net/peter/blog/archives/12/comment-page-1/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>Mandy Novotny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 17:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pallock.net/peter/blog/archives/12/#comment-387</guid>
		<description>I love the blend of sacred and &quot;secular&quot; on your blog, Peter. Glad you&#039;re taking the time to record your ponderings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the blend of sacred and &#8220;secular&#8221; on your blog, Peter. Glad you&#8217;re taking the time to record your ponderings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
